Talk:Lung cancer staging

Missing information

Why doesn't this seem to contain a list of the stages, the criteria for being placed in those stages, and a quick summary of the treatment outcomes for each stage? Treatment for Stage I has a much better prognosis than treatment for Stage IV. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:12, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it does seem ironic that the article entitled "Lung cancer staging" doesn't actually have the lung cancer staging system in it. I previously created the article "Non-small cell lung carcinoma staging" three years ago with the staging listed. That article has since been renamed "Non-small cell lung carcinoma". Axl ¤ [Talk] 08:37, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

So what would we be looking at? Two major classes of cancers, times several staging systems each? WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

TNM material needs to be here I think. May get to it. Needs to be updated on all related articles, and I have done just a little in the Non-small cell lung carcinoma article to get it started.FeatherPluma (talk) 17:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Altho I did not add the actual copyright TNM descriptors or groups, I added accessible links to that information, as well as some content on what it generally means.FeatherPluma (talk) 17:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

• • You are right. TNM staging has to be written... Humpath (talk) 09:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

And Stage 4 Lung cancer means what?

This article desparately needs help to serve the average Joe. Cancer staging describes a Stage 0-4 system and there is no mention of it whatsoever here. What do these stages means for lung cancer? Why does this article pay more attention to the development of categories and diagnosis than to the categories themselves? D O N D E groovily Talk to me 16:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Good suggestion. On it. Will add stage groupings, as well as survival statistics (from Rami-Porta and 2007 Goldstraw) and also a simplified outline of Rx options based on stage if I can get to it.FeatherPluma (talk) 18:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links –on Lung cancer staging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928055151/http://www.cancerstaging.org/products/csmanual4ed.pdf to http://www.cancerstaging.org/products/csmanual4ed.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928053254/http://www.cancerstaging.org/staging/posters/lung8.5x11.pdf to http://www.cancerstaging.org/staging/posters/lung8.5x11.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110423065044/http://nccn.com/images/patient-guidelines/pdf/nsclc.pdf to http://www.nccn.com/images/patient-guidelines/pdf/nsclc.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110106025146/https://nhathuoclp.com/ung-thu-phoi-cac-loai-ung-thu-phoi/ to https://nhathuoclp.com/ung-thu-phoi-cac-loai-ung-thu-phoi/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/reprint/111/6/1710
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080927163829/http://www.gi-guy.com/endoscopic_ultrasound_resources.html to http://www.gi-guy.com/endoscopic_ultrasound_resources.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC) –––