This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge
editAgree.Julia Rossi (talk) 00:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Disagree. One deals with rituals, one deals with a diety. Though the ritual may be in honor of the diety, they are two seperate things. (AFLitt (talk) 21:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC))
Encyclopedic treatment of subjects is different from dictionary treatments, which break thoughts into their smallest constituent parts. Encyclopedic thinking seems to elude many at Wikipedia. Lupercus is meaningless except in the context of what we can surmise from Lupercalia. --Wetman (talk) 23:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Confusion
editThis article has become very confused. Is it about a Roman god [1] or a Greek grammarian? [2] Biscuittin (talk) 23:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)