Talk:Lure of the Temptress/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Czarkoff (talk · contribs) 09:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

I believe this nomination qualifies for quick fail as 3 of 4 sections are backed up only by primary or otherwise connected sources. The two independent sources in the "References" section also suggest the insufficient breadth of coverage, as the reviews highlight some properties of the game that are not mentioned in the article at all. Thus I see no point in thorough checking of the other GA criteria, as addressing these should change the article pretty significantly. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 09:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC)