Talk:Lutheran scholasticism

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Criticism

edit

Lutheran scholasticism have been pretty heavily criticised from inside Lutheranism, firstly the Pietist general rejection, secondly non-Pietist Lutheran critics that allege that late Lutheran scholasticism attached meanings to the arguments of opponents to Lutheranism, that those opponents never intended; therefore it has been alleged to be a dishonest argumentation tool. I'll keep my eyes open for sources. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 11:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lutheran scholasticism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply