Talk:Luton DART

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Krk1971 in topic Crediting designers

Controversies?

edit

Controversy sections are generally discouraged in articles as they impact neutrality. As it stands, the only points covered in this section are a delay to the project, and criticism that DART is a bit too expensive. These issues hardly constitute "protracted public disputes" and do not merit a separate section. I suggest they be merged back into the history section. Cnbrb (talk) 19:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

I think it makes sense for delays to be in the "history" section. Perhaps the ticket price discussion could be included in a new section under "Operation"? Garuda3 (talk) 19:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Seems reasonable. I think that's where they were before. Cnbrb (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Crediting designers

edit

Hi there, I am new to Wikipedia and am trying to find out how I might legitimately credit my company for their involvement in this project. I understand there are issues around conflict of interest as I am employed by the company on whose behalf I would like to credit the involvement. We were the structural engineers who designed both of the new stations for Luton DART, which can be confirmed here https://www.hewson-consulting.com/project/luton-dart-parkway-station/ and here https://www.hewson-consulting.com/project/luton-dart-terminal-station/

Large infrastructure projects such as this one obviously involve many different players, but typically it is just the main contractors that get mentioned.

I would appreciate any advice or input! Krk1971 (talk) 08:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply