Talk:Luxborough

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge Pooltown

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The way this village was 'articled' was asymetric, with redirects for the hamlets of Kingsbridge and Churchtown, but a separate article for Pooltown. The Pooltown article said very little that this article didn't, and nothing that couldn't easily be added. So I've merged the two articles, and made Pooltown a redirect.

The one downside of this is that we lose the geo coordinates of Pooltown. However as all the hamlets are within 1 mile of each other, on balance I think we can live with this. The alternative would be to create articles for Kingsbridge and Churchtown, as well as reinstating Pooltown. Both approaches have precedents, and I've done similar myself for other places, so I've no problem if somebody wants to go down that route. -- Starbois (talk) 10:11, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

On reflection, I think I went down this route because of the wording of the article, which told me that Luxborough was a single village made up of three hamlets. If the article had said Luxborough was a civil parish made up of three villages, I would have been more likely to plump for separate articles. That might help future editors make up their minds what to do. -- Starbois (talk) 10:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luxborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121008052003/http://www.domesdaymap.co.uk/hundred/carhampton/ to http://www.domesdaymap.co.uk/hundred/carhampton/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic