Talk:Lwówek Śląski

Recent edits by IP 71.81.137.167

So, IP 71.81.137.167 wants to include the facts that Poles settled there earlier and that the area was previously part of Poland. That's all fine, but

• don't remove credible sources
• don't alter the statement of a source by moving the source
• don't add sources which don't support the facts

The towns website doesn't state that Poles settled earlier in the area, that's why I removed this source again. And the town was founded inside the duchy of Wroclaw 15 years after Poland fragmented. I don't know why it needs to be mentioned that a forest was part of Poland before. Karasek (talk) 08:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

If fact that the Poles settled there earlier and that the area was previously part of Poland. (Look at your own words) why t.f. you removed that info and the supported source?--24.182.186.67 (talk) 05:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Please read the given source and tell me where exactly this source mentions a earlier Polish settlement. I cannot find anything. Until a credible source clearly refers to a earlier settlement there is no need to mention Poland, since nothing existed there before the foundation of the town. Who cares about a forest?

PS: please register. Karasek (talk) 10:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lwówek Śląski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160422095825/http://www.twinning.pl/item/miasta.pdf to http://www.twinning.pl/item/miasta.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• LS multi photo.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:51, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

'once again part of Poland'

This refers to the proagandistic claism of recovered lands and is not politically neutral. The Slavic settlements (even unclear whether one existed, see talk above) is so far back that 'once again' is just silly. It makes the false impression that the city was switching from PL to DE and back several times which is NOT the case. This could be said of maybe Danzig/Gdansk but not about places in Lower Silesia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tino Cannst (talk • contribs) 06:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)