Talk:Lymphoma
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Lymphoma.
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 November 2019 and 21 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Marmasphan.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
References
editThe alignment of Ref 34 is different … there doesn't seem to be any need for the indent - but I'm unable to correct it.
Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 05:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Is first sentence of lead correct?
editOne of the many things I was wondering about lymphoma is whether it develops from mature lymphocytes, immature lymphocytes, or lymphocyte precursors; or from different cells in different types of lymphoma. The article doesn't seem to settle that, after the opening sentence. So I took a look at the source. The part that can be read for free doesn't seem to say. I hope someone who knows enough, and has good enough access to reliable sources, will add more information about the underlying biology of lymphomas. --Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (talk) 18:38, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Contradiction in article
editCurrently, the lede says that 10% of all lymphoma are Hodgkins Lymphoma, but under Classification it says that 15% are. Somebody who knows far more than I do needs to correct whichever one of these is wrong. JDZeff (talk) 07:51, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
WHO classification section
editElements that can selectively display or hide content can interfere with the ability of readers to access said content. Screen readers can not read content this is hidden. Moreover, content in an article should never be collapsed by default. This applies equally to content in tables and embedded lists per MOS:COLLAPSE. If the information is important and the concern is article density or length, consider dividing the article into more sections, integrating unnecessarily list-formatted information into the article prose, or splitting the article per MOS:DONTHIDE. Isaidnoway (talk) 10:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)