Talk:Lynn Zechiedrich
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Subject not notable enough for page.
editThis page appears to be some professors CV, and is not worthy of a Wikipedia page. 2600:1700:F2F0:43B0:BDA2:2528:7A6C:EA8A (talk) 05:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Article appears to be self-aggrandizing
editArticles tone and structure appears to include a lot of subjective and exaggerated material, often grandiose. Often, shared accomplishments like patents are written to sound as if she was the sole inventor, and the “Flutist” section is bizzare.
The subject is also simply one of many tens of thousands of professors, and many of the awards and honors are minor or typical. The entire thing reads like a resume rather than an article about a notable individual. 2600:1700:F2F0:43B0:BDA2:2528:7A6C:EA8A (talk) 05:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Article should be considered for deletion
editAgreeing with the other reviewers here, this page reads largley as a CV. The fact the whole page was not deleted during the removal of the "flutist" section is strange. While Zechiedrich appears to be an accomplished investigator the article appears to be self written or self-promotional at best. RickAndMortise (talk) 17:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)