Talk:Lyrtech
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 February 2014. The result of the discussion was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn). |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Lyrtech logo.png
edit
Image:Lyrtech logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Development of the Ad Lib sound card
editWould love to see the history of the involvement of LyrTech in the development of the Ad Lib sound card. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanph01 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- I couldn't find any sources about that. Someone not using his real name (talk) 04:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
More sources
editMost sources about the company are in French; La Presse has most of them here. This wiki page provides a very incomplete picture (too rosy); the company was in trouble even it wasn't on the verge of bankruptcy. The growth in revenues wasn't matched by a growth in profits etc. They were actually operating at a pretty big loss even they got that Deloitte ward [1] Also the direction of the company changed at least a couple of times. [2][3] Someone not using his real name (talk) 04:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)