Talk:Ménage à 3 (webcomic)

unreliable /self-published sources

Just a heads up: Livejournal posts, personal blogs, wikis, and tvtropes.org are not reliable sources, because anyone can edit or post content on those sites. --Animalparty-- (talk) 03:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

The blogs, journal posts, etc., are there for two reasons. First, to convey the reception the subject has received. In the world of webcomic, a review by a blogger is just as credible (and sometimes moreso) than conventional media sources as fans of the genre tend to trust the opinions and validation of bloggers. Secondly, it is merely back up information to further verify some of the storylines, characters and other information. Hobbamock (talk) 13:25, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ménage à 3 (webcomic). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120719213315/http://comixtalk.com/most_read_final_version to http://comixtalk.com/most_read_final_version

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ménage à 3 (webcomic). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140313001100/http://comicsalliance.com/threes-company-menage-webcomic/ to http://comicsalliance.com/threes-company-menage-webcomic/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Complete rewrite

As noted during the discussion on whether to delete this article, the article had a number of problems. It made claims not actually supported by the sources ("In 2008 Ménage à 3 was listed amongst the top 50 webcomics annually"), it sourced large amounts from personal blogs, much of the information was out of date.

As such I've completely rewritten the article to only use material from reliable secondary sources. If you'd like to expand it more, please do so, but either make sure it is clearly sourced from a reliable secondary source, or is a simple description of the plot sourced from the primary source. HenryCrun15 (talk) 03:17, 26 July 2022 (UTC)