Talk:M-120 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AdmrBoltz 00:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|hold}}

Comments

• Second Muskegon link in the Major junctions section should be unlinked per WP:OVERLINK.
  • Done. Imzadi 1979 →
• Images would be nice, but are not a GA requirement. You may wanna include a copy of an old map for the previous routing of the highway. I would recommend the portion that links from Ohio Route 120.
• "In the aftermath of the reroute, the M-20 designation was moved to run from Hesperia to New Era."
  • Done. Imzadi 1979 →
• "That concurrency was removed in 1978." link concurrency.
  • "ran concurrently" in the previous sentence is already linked to that article. Imzadi 1979 → 00:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Passing --AdmrBoltz 00:48, 1 March 2011 (UTC)