Talk:M-122 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: — PCB 14:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Perhaps a reference for that people had to take the ferry in the route description?

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Putting article on hold for minor issue.

   I added a citation for that sentence, which is not any of the following: "direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, [or] contentious material relating to living persons. Those are the only items required to have citations under the GA criteria. Also note, I reverted your addition of periods to the lead sentence of the article; the Chicago Manual of Style no longer requires them and our MoS is following suit. Imzadi 1979 → 18:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)