Talk:M-149 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starstriker7^(Talk) 04:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Lots of map references that are hard for me to check, but I will trust them, as I did on the last one I reviewed.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   As with the other, to add images would be awesome; it is hard for me to envision these highways, as I can imagine it would be for other out-of-staters as well. But it does not keep this one from becoming a good article. Congratulations on rolling another one off of the assembly line. :) --Starstriker7^(Talk) 04:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)