Talk:M-19 (Michigan highway)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Dom497 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    Quality of article is good.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Article complies with MoS.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    Good.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    References included where necessary.
    C. No original research:  
    No original research found.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    All major aspects of the topic have been covered.
    B. Focused:  
    Article remains focused throughout.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    No bias found.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Article is stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    All images used are tagged correctly.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Images are provided, appropriate, and have suitable captions.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit

Everything is good, nothing needs to be fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply