Talk:M-203 (Michigan highway)/GA1

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Admrboltz in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    "This cancellation was reversed in late 1940." cite?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    minor issue in 2a. --Admrboltz (talk) 04:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Reference #9 is the state map that shows 1) the redesignation/cancellation reversal and 2) the simultaneous extension north to Calumet. Imzadi1979 (talk) 04:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
AGF'ing. Pass --Admrboltz (talk) 04:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply