Talk:M-59 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 19:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The route description is written in the wrong direction. It should be west-to-east, not east-to-west. In the history, there are two consecutive sentences that begin with "The east end". Can one of these instances be changed?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I do not think reference 3 fully supports the first sentence of the route description. It could be used in conjunction with another reference such as a map.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Can a little more descriptive information be added to the lead? In addition, the route description seems short for a 60-mile road. Can information about the physical environment and attractions the route passes by be added, in addition to major intersections?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   An image of the road would be nice, but not required.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I will put the article on hold to allow for some fixes. Dough4872 19:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

How's that? Imzadi 1979 → 21:49, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Looks good, so I will now pass the article. Dough4872 01:04, 31 August 2010 (UTC)