Talk:M-75 (Michigan highway)/GA1
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Dana boomer in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 19:57, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- In the History section, the sentence "The M-75 designation is left unaltered as US 27 between Gaylord and Indian River is converted to a freeway and renamed I-75 in 1962." is confusing me. I'm really not sure what you're trying to say. Could you try to rewrite it an clarify, please?
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
One comment about prose, so I am putting the article on hold. Other than that, a very nice article! Drop me a note here on the review page or on my talk page if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:04, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- See if the rewrite works better for you now. Imzadi1979 (talk) 22:20, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- That looks much better! Thank you for your quick response. I'm passing the article now. Dana boomer (talk) 00:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)