Talk:M-93 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 18:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Can some more detail about the physical environment the route passes through be added to the route description? The current route description seems a little dry as it mainly describes intersections with other roads.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   An image of the road would be nice, but not required.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Just one concern with the route description, otherwise the article looks good. Dough4872 18:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

How's that? Imzadi 1979 → 19:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

The route description looks better, so I will pass the article. Dough4872 19:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)