Talk:MACHO-1997-BLG-41

"MACHO-1997-BLG-41c"

Under the current system of naming lensing planets, MACHO-1997-BLG-41Lc might be more likely (as it is located in the system, so presumably the stars would be LA and LB), but whether the letter b or c would be assigned, or whether the L would be used is another matter.

To put it bluntly, we don't have any idea what it would be called. These designations have not been used, anywhere. Chaos syndrome 23:01, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

There is no planet in this system

At present, there is no evidence for a planet in this system. Just as we do not list the disproven planet Vulcan (which was once thought to be located inside the orbit of Mercury) in lists of the planets in our solar system, there is no need to list the planet that has been disproven orbiting the MACHO-1997-BLG-41 lens binary. The inclusion of a planetbox is highly misleading as it suggests that there are grounds for believing the planet might exist. 131.111.8.104 (talk) 21:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MACHO-1997-BLG-41. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060523194849/http://www.obspm.fr/encycl/97-BLG-41.html to http://www.obspm.fr/encycl/97-BLG-41.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)