Wikipedia

Talk:MD Helicopters MH-6 Little Bird

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)
Learn more about this page

Specs

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago8 comments4 people in discussion
  • The specs seem to cover a range of H-6s with the dimension ranges. Would it be easier/better to list the AH/MH-6J or AH/MH-6M in the specs? I'm not seeing an easy mil source for either right now. Thanks. -Fnlayson 17:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Might have to use MD 530MG specs since the actual aircraft specs are probably going to be classified. Should get you in the right ballpark. Jane's might have a reference, also. --Born2flie 18:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
This book, Harding, Stephen (1997). U.S. Army Aircraft Since 1947. Atglen, PA, USA: Schiffer Publishing Ltd. p. 251. ISBN 96-69996. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: length (help), has good details on the various H-6 variants, including basic specs on the various models. It covers the MH-6A/B/C/E/H/J, and AH-6A/C/F/G/J, but not the more recent -6M models. I'll try to work on the spces this week, probably the -6J. The AH-6G and MH-6H were both based on the MD 530MG, and were then upraged to -6J standard. So I think Born has it right in using the 530MG specs, if we can find them, then I'll correct them to the -6J were needed, noting that the rest are for the 530MG. Btw, the book is a good reference source, covering almost all Army aircraft since 1947. It's been printed in 2 editions, 1990 and 1998 (the one I have), so it is dated for current models, but overall it's pretty accurte to my limited background. There are some obvious errors, such as treating the Hawker P.1127 and the XV-6 Kestrel as the same aircraft - they're not the same, though they are VERY CLOSELY related, and we cover both on the same page in Wikipedia. - BillCJ 19:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • From the Defender article, I got the 530MG is based on the MD 530F. So I used MD 530F specs from the MD Helicopters page. I listed max engine power and derated takeoff and continuous power levels. If that's confusing, the max engine power can be removed or something. Should be good enough for now. -Fnlayson 03:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I'll try to check the specs with my book Fri or Sat, and see if I can tweak them. Btw, as I understand it, Little Birds have been fitted with NOTAR at times, though not now. It would be nice if we could find a pic of one of them. I tried several keywords on http://www.dodmedia.osd.mil/ , but no luck. - BillCJ 04:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Any updates on A/MH-6 specs or anything else? I'd expect the empty weight would go up due to armament and stuff. The mil version's engine power might be increased over the MD 530F. Thanks. -Fnlayson 03:48, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Some time ago I've added the Harding U.S. Army book as another reference for the specs, mainly the armament info. -Fnlayson (talk) 00:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

The MD 530F is now in use by the Afghan Air Force. I'm not up to editing the page now. If someone else doesn't take it up, I'll come back to it when I have time and bandwidth. http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/military-again-afghan-af-picks-md-530f-helicopters-06804/ http://www.janes.com/article/61622/afghan-air-force-gets-five-more-md-530f-attack-helicopters Two of which have been lost. They have also been modified, but are still apparently designated MD 530F

There are differing opinions about the usefulness of the aircraft in Afghanistan. Happy to let expert wikipedians decide whether this is relevant or not: http://www.janes.com/article/54845/afghan-md-530f-lost-to-accident-air-force-criticises-helicopter-s-performance https://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htairfo/articles/20160918.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:2153:5800:CD39:1E09:AEA5:687A (talk) 20:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ref tags?

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Fnlayson, do you think we really need three tags? I don't question the need for at least one tag, but wouldn't the one at the top be sufficient? Just asking. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE 19:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't care much now. I believe a user dumped uncited text in and I tagged it. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Okay, then I'll leave the one at the top. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE 19:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

tense in the development section

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The present tense is used for what seem like 50 year old capabilities and decisions, and the section switches from power outputs that must be going on 50 years old to almost contemporaneous model designations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.223.87 (talk) 04:22, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on MD Helicopters MH-6 Little Bird. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on MD Helicopters MH-6 Little Bird. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:MD Helicopters MH-6 Little Bird/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== Start class == A little cleaning up and this will be a B-Class article. --Born2flie 11:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 20:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 22:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on MD Helicopters MH-6 Little Bird. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MD Helicopters MH-6 Little Bird. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:MD_Helicopters_MH-6_Little_Bird&oldid=1203949552"