Talk:MEDIA sub-programme of Creative Europe

Latest comment: 5 years ago by StraussInTheHouse in topic Requested move 26 February 2019

Requested move 26 February 2019

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 21:25, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply



MEDIA ProgrammeMedia Programme of the European Union – Per MOS:TM, MOS:CAPS, MOS:ABBR. This is not an acronym, it's "logo capitals", just like "SONY" for Sony. The phase "Media Programme" is too ambiguous (should redirect to Program#Arts and entertainment disambiguation section). We should use full names as natural disambigation when possible, not resort to parenthetical constructions like "Media Programme (European Union)", though that should exist as a redirect. It would be much more WP:CONSISTENT use the full name of the organization, to agree with our treatment of other such entities (see Category:Agencies of the European Union, Category:Institutions of the European Union, Category:United Nations Development Group, Category:United Nations specialized agencies etc.; there are a handful of exceptions, but all of them have word-acronym names that have become their WP:COMMONNAMEs by a very wide margin, as in the case of UNICEF and UNESCO (most people have heard of them but not of their full names, presenting a WP:RECOGNIZABILITY issue that does not exist in this case).  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  18:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

PS: If anyone wants to say "Well, the EU spells it MEDIA, so it's official", see WP:OFFICIALNAMES: WP simply doesn't care whether something's official. Reliable sources would have to consistently refer to this as, and only as, "MEDIA Programme", not "Media Programme of the European Union", and that clearly isn't the case [1].
PPS: The article text reads as if mostly plagiarized directly from a brochure or webpage, though this may not be a copyright problem (I'm not sure what copyright might or might not apply to EU work).
PPPS: If this move proceeds, the resulting MEDIA Programme redirect should have {{R from trademark}} and {{R from alternative capitalisation|of=Media Programme}} added.
 — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  18:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.