Talk:MIL-W-46374
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links
editAre the links to pages such as Metal and Plastic really necessary in this article? It's possible people might want to look into the makeup of these things further, but it seems doubtful they'd use this article as a starting point for that research. Forgive me, I'm new, so I'm not entirely sure of the procedure as far as things like this go. JamesRustler (talk) 22:03, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio Sources?
editThe potential copyvio marked on the article page is [1]. Compare the text around "Another influence was probably the astonishingly legible" and the surrounding paragraphs. TwoMartiniTuesday (talk) 08:26, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Information in copyright violation has been removed from the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on MIL-W-46374. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130116224922/http://www.antiquevintagewatches.com/military-watches.html to http://www.antiquevintagewatches.com/military-watches.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)