Talk:MOA-2009-BLG-387Lb/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Eustress in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:Eustress talk 04:58, 2 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
This article appears to me to satisfy all Good Article criteria. Regarding notability, a concern raised by another editor previously, I believe WP:GNG is also satisfied. The significant coverage provision of the policy has less to do with multiplicity of coverage and more to do with substance derived from the source pertaining to the subject. In this case, there is an entire article from a reliable source dedicated to the planet.

I believe the lead could be presented more concisely per WP:LEAD, and I think the Characteristics section should be merged with the Host star section, and the Main article link removed since the star is already wikilinked throughout the article. However, these are minor issues and no reasons to hold up GA status. Therefore, my decision is to pass to GA status. Congratulations. —Eustress talk 04:58, 2 July 2011 (UTC)Reply