Wikipedia

Talk:MONUSCO

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 77.230.192.62 in topic Suggestion addition to MONUSCO controversies
Learn more about this page

Current personnel numbers

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The number of personnel each country has sent for both military & civilian positions needs to be updated. I update the total for each section as provided on http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/missions/monuc/facts.html. Earthsound 22:41, 17 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Creation's date of the mission

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Article says that the United Nations Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo was created by Resolution 1291 of the UN Security Council, on February 24, 2000. It seems to be false, because we can find, quite three months earlier, another resolution (1273, on November 30, 1999, see French version of the resolution, item 4.) which seems to prove that the mission was already existing, and maybe earlier more (but without any official name approved by the Security Council). Hégésippe | ±Θ± 06:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Indeed! MONUC was created by Resolution 1258 (1999) para. 8, authorizing the deployment of up to 90 United Nations military liaison personnel, together with the necessary civilian, political, humanitarian and administrative staff. Resolution 1273 (1999) extended the mandate of the United Nations military liaison personnel deployed under paragraph 8 of resolution 1258 (1999). With Resolution 1279 (1999) para. 4, the Security Council decided that the personnel authorized under its resolutions 1258 (1999) and 1273 (1999) [...] shall constitute the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUC). Henning Blatt (talk) 00:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Update

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page is always in a constant need of updates, so you could always give us a hand, like Earthsound. Thank you for your help!--Andronicus92 19:57, 29 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's pretty tricky tracking the troop numbers. Although they are contained in the UN Secretary General's reports back to UN Security Council, they're a pain to dig out. Anyhow, added UN Infobox, per the UN Portal's "to do" list, which down the line could make updating that kind of figure a little easier. Tlongers (talk) 07:43, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

>> Congo and the General (Lihaas (talk) 15:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)).Reply

Splitting the Page

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think the page might benefit from being split into separate pages for MONUC and MONUSCO, given the changes in mandate, strategy, tactics and force structure. This would obviously require some pretty serious expansion. Be interested to hear others' thoughts. --Scrooge (talk) 12:38, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 17:04, 1 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo → MONUSCO – Wikipedia:COMMONNAME. The current article title is rather long. I suggest we use its acronym which is equally well known. Ali Fazal (talk) 20:57, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Support although I think a restructuring would be appropriate, possibly per year or group of years... That could include the idea that MONUC was for year x to year y, then MONUSCO from year y - present. The Force Intervention Brigade (FIB) is currently a separate page. I'm not sure what the policy/guidelines on that are, but as more information comes into the public domain, I intend to update that page substantially. BoonDock (talk) 13:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Facts

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I read with interest the point that says: "Between 21 and 29 August, heavy fighting outside Goma left 57 rebels, 10–23 government soldiers, 14 civilians and one Tanzanian U.N. peacekeeper dead. 720 government soldiers and 10 U.N. peacekeepers were also wounded.[46][47][48][49]" I have NO IDEA what the source is for the rebel casualties, as I was on the ground then as part of the FIB. There is no way that there were only 57 rebel casualties. Our estimates exceed that number wounded and in the various rebel field hospitals, never mind how many had been killed directly. BoonDock (talk) 14:00, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 2

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago6 comments6 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page not moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

MONUSCO → United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Long it may seem, but it was recently moved to the current title by just one "support" vote, excluding the nominator's. One person suggested using both the proposed and the current title. The closing administrator missed that and didn't relist it. As for claims of being "commonly used", the whole proposed name must have been used by the press most of the time instead of (pronounced mohn-nuhs-ko). I don't know; maybe authors and/or editors must have copied and pasted the whole long title. Besides commonality, not an average reader would type either title. Who else here knows what "MONUSCO" is already? George Ho (talk) 09:06, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • oppose - I'm not sure what the argument is here. MONUSCO is certainly the most common name here, regardless of whether the nominator has heard of the topic before. It's billed above the full name on the top of the official website and then used throughout he site. There is also no ambiguity about another topic this could stand for, obviously. And hell, it seems to be the name above the doorway to the building. The first equivalents popping to mind are probably UNESCO and UNICEF.--Yaksar (let's chat) 16:22, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • oppose: The French might be a common name, but tbh I think it's the same as NATO - the acronym is so much more common for obvious reasons...—Brigade Piron (talk) 18:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • same edit as last time:
Suggest, the even longer form: "MONUSCO - United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo". The html title (search engine title) of the official site (http://monusco.unmissions.org/) is found in searches including MONUSCO AND "United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo". The long title would remain intelligible in contexts such as in Category:United Nations Security Council mandates. Gregkaye ✍♪ 21:36, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on MONUSCO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on MONUSCO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on MONUSCO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on MONUSCO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MONUSCO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MONUSCO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 18:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Update

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Will this article be updated beyond 2017? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 07:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion addition to MONUSCO controversies

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Regarding the section about MONUSCO controversies, I quote from another Wikipedia article, about religion in the DRC: "It was reported in 2019 that the Pakistani contingent of the United Nations MONUSCO force was reported to have financed the construction of new mosques in the region, contributing to an "islamisation" of Eastern Congo." Original reporting source: Braeckman, Colette (7 December 2019). "L'Est du Congo, nouvelle cible du combat djihadiste?". Le Carnet de Colette Braeckman. Le Soir. Retrieved 17 December 2019. --77.230.192.62 (talk) 09:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:MONUSCO&oldid=1235443012"