Talk:MPEG-7

Latest comment: 3 months ago by SimonWiseman in topic External link broken
edit

I am reverting the bullet on frameline video notation; please do not add it back without explanation. It appears very non-notable from Google searches, and isn't even released yet (still in beta)? As such this external link would be considered advertising/spam. I haven't looked in detail into the others so feel free to remove other links or even the entire section. Quarl (talk) 2006-02-05 22:34Z

Removing a link to the ONLY commercially available MPEG-7 software from the MPEG-7 page makes no sense to me. Frameline is currently in Public Beta yes, but is available to pre-order - so it is for sale. All the other tools listed here are also valid, but are little more than esoteric test apps & tools. Frameline 47 is the first of a kind and a very important application for the MPEG community.

Please read this feedback;

Great product! We're very excited about what you folks have done and have been waiting for this a long time. I teach our streaming course and evangalize the MPEG-4 format due to its amazing potential. Discussing MPEG-7 with someone usually flies over their heads - but wow - we're finally there! I would be interested in working with your company to see what we can do at Utah Valley State in the Digital Media Department.

James The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jwengwell (talk • contribs) .

Please provide a published reference about Frameline to show that is a notable software, and a reference for it being the first commercial software for MPEG-7. See also: WP:SPAM. Quarl (talk) 2006-02-08 21:34Z

Descriptors and Description Schemes

edit

The links for Descriptor and Description scheme are not correct: A Description Scheme is - although based on XML - written in DDL. A Descriptor in MPEG-7 has no connection to the article linked to the word Descriptor. 143.205.122.226 08:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC) motteReply

Missing an example

edit

After reading this article, I'm still in the dark about what kind of metadata this is aimed for. I can't tell whether bibliographic data such as a movie title, year of production or cast of characters would be appropriate for this metadata, or, if so, how they would be represented. Knowing that this standard is kind of a langauge for talking about the language for describing videos - still, an example would go a long way towards making this article concrete. --Alvestrand (talk) 08:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on MPEG-7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on MPEG-7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

The link to the Overview is broken, but I don't know what it should be. Anyone? SimonWiseman (talk) 20:52, 29 July 2024 (UTC)Reply