Talk:M (James Bond)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Schrodinger's cat is alive in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    ""once again under written, and brown is not allowed the opportunity to explore and reveal his character traits,[33] with the character being "too nice"." - is the sentence from once to traits a quote?
    ""Christ, I miss the Cold War")." - why a bracket?
    "is a out-dated relic" - an?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Ref 6,10,12,16,17,20,23,29,50,51,53 don't point to any citation. Overall fine.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • Some formatting issues
The quote box could do with aligning to either the left or right side, with the text wrapped around it.
Where the films are listed there is a bit white space. I would put Bernard Lee's and Judi Dench's films/games into 2 columns to remove some of this white space.
Mattg82 (talk) 23:53, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply