Talk:Ma'anshan

Untitled

A comment was put in the article which should be in the discussion - 位置放错了，而且地理位置也描述错了. Supposely this needs to be corrected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.173.36 (talk) 19:25, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

I moved this page from Ma'anshan to Maanshan since:

1. The official pinyin romanization is Maanshan. (No apostrophe between Ma and an is needed since there is no pinyin syllable Maan.) See http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~chifc/pinyin.html.
2. 15000 Google results for Maanshan versus 3000 for Ma'anshan.
3. The official municipal website lists Maanshan.

☞spencer195 20:11, 8 May 2004 (UTC)

A rule that we currently have on Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) puts an apostrophe in "Ma'anshan". You're welcome to come and discuss the rule. -- [[User:Ran|ran (talk)]] 20:53, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)

In any case the explanation "(simplified Chinese: 马鞍山; traditional Chinese: 馬鞍山; pinyin: Mǎ'ānshān)" is wrong, as Pinyin doesn't put a '. 117.136.34.129 (talk) 02:24, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ma'anshan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140225124039/http://www.mas.gov.cn/En/Enlist.aspx to http://www.mas.gov.cn/En/Enlist.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)