Talk:Maastrichtian

Latest comment: 6 years ago by CuriousEric in topic Size of the Impactor

Too Much Bird Info?

edit

This page is about the Maastrichtian, and while it's good to have a short summary of what defines the animal groups that lived at the time, I think the amount of info under the bird heading is excessive to the point of detracting from the article's main subject matter. Abyssal leviathin 20:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Actually, cancel that, I think. the new additions look pretty good. But... I think I've seen some inaccuracies. The Ichthyornis article says that the genus went extinct prior to the Maastrichtian. What's up with that? Abyssal leviathin 20:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maastrichtian Dinosaur Record

edit

My searches for Maastrichtian dated dinosaur remains are coming up empty. Does a data base exist for dinosaur dating across the Cretaceous? Morbas (talk) 16:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Try Flora and fauna of the Maastrichtian stage. Mikenorton (talk) 16:35, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Recent NOVA documentary "Arctic Dinosaur" lists the beasts found on the AK Northern Slope dated to 70Ma ago. The Dinosaur bone structure indicates a warm blooded taxa, residing in Arctic and Antarctic polar regions: counters the Meteorite global cooling causal. The Dinosaurs thrived above the arctic circle (4x closer to the poles than the present AK fossil locations). The documentary video lists multiple Dinosaur Species uncovered above the Artic Circle and proposes the 65Ma ago meteorite event could not have terminated these Dinosaurs.Morbas (talk) 04:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Does anyone bknow why there aren't maastrichtian dinosaurs coming from Africa (excluding Madagascar) ? Longfinmako (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

It's probably due to lack of exploration of Maastrichtian rocks, rare terrestrial Maastrichtian rocks, or both. J. Spencer (talk) 01:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

End date

edit

Isn't it 66.5 mya, not 66.0?142.176.114.76 (talk) 18:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Maastrichtian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Size of the Impactor

edit

Per Talk:Chicxulub_impactor#Size_of_the_Impactor, sources seem to vary for the size of the impactor. Unless the sources are better, the range should be 10-15 km. The three articles Chicxulub_impactor, Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, and Maastrichtian should be kept in line with each other. CuriousEric 14:33, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply