Talk:Machimosaurus

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Machimosaurus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141020000838/http://paleopedia.free.fr/croco_thalattosuchia.html to http://paleopedia.free.fr/croco_thalattosuchia.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

clash between two articles on size

from the table at Crocodylomorpha - Deinosuchus riograndensis 39 ft, yet Machimosaurus is declared the largest crocodylomph ? 104.169.16.115 (talk) 04:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Estimations in meters from each Wikipedia article (considering the most representative studies; some studies, widely considered as inaccurate, might have not benn considred).

• Purussaurus brasiliensis: 10.3 - 13 (One study also indicates that Purussaurus may have been heavier than either Sarcosuchus or Deinosuchus).
• Deinosuchus riograndensis: 10.6 - 12
• Gryposuchus croizati: 10.15
• Rhamphosuchus crassidens: 8 - 11 (10 according to a study from 2001)
• Mourasuchus amazonensis: 9.47
• Sarcosuchus imperator: 9.0 - 9.1

This list shows the reason why both species, Purussaurus brasiliensis and Deinosuchus riograndensis, have been categorized as the largest species from the of the order Crocodilia of the clade Eusuchia of the clade Neosuchia of the clade Metasuchia of the clade Mesoeucrocodylia of the clade Crocodyliformes of the superorder Crocodylomorpha.

In Tunisia, in 2016, the Machimosaurus rex was discovered. It was a species of the Machimosaurus genus of the Machimosaurini tribe of the Machimosauridae family of the Thalattosuchia subgroup or suborder of the clade Metasuchia of the clade Mesoeucrocodylia of the clade Crocodyliformes of the superorder Crocodylomorpha. It estimated length was initially 9.6m but later studies, in the same year, proposed the 6.9 - 7.15 m range.

In Colombia in 2019, a species of the superfamily Teleosauroidea of the subgroup or suborder Thalattosuchia of the clade Metasuchia of the clade Mesoeucrocodylia of the clade Crocodyliformes of the superorder Crocodylomorpha, was estimated to have a length of 9.6m. As far as I know, this species has not been given a name by the resarchers or, identified as an already catalogued species.

George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

References

Clash between two sentences.

At the introduction it reads

Machimosaurus rex is the largest named teleosauroid and thalattosuchian, with an estimated length of approximately 7.2 metres (skull length 155 cm).

Almost at the end of the article, it reads

In 2016, a new species of Machimosaurus discovered in Tunisia was described in the journal Cretaceous Research. Named Machimosaurus rex, it was the largest teleosauroid known at the time, estimated to be 9.6 m (31.5 ft) in length (skull length 155 cm (61 in)) based on a partial skeleton.

Each sentence provides a different source.

George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 08:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

The species found in Colombia is a Teleosauroidea but, is it a Machimosaurus?

Teleosauroidea is a super family that has 3 subgroups: †Plagiophthalmosuchus, †Machimosauridae and †Teleosauridae. The Colombian specimen was classified as a member of the Teleosauroidea super family. But, does it belong to the Machimosauridae subgroup? If it does not belong to such subgroup, it should nor be mentioned here. George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 08:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)