Talk:Macklemore & Ryan Lewis

Latest comment: 6 months ago by 24.180.22.224 in topic Verb Tense

}}

Resources

edit

Empty page is empty - dropping this here as a potential source http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/27/2013-lgbt-allies_n_4473631.html--94.193.127.111 (talk) 01:28, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

This article needs to be deleted.

edit

It has just as much relevance as a will.i.am and Britney Spears article or a Jay-Z & Kanye West article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.58.172.195 (talk) 00:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I thought about this problem when I saw that their work together had been removed from Macklemore's discography page. Although they have worked together a lot, I question whether they are a legitimate, separate musical act or just two artists working together. Sources referring to them as a "duo" don't really count, as a duo is often used to refer to any two artists working together on a piece. This really needs more discussion among other editors, as I suspect opinions will be quite subjective. I Am RufusConversation is a beautiful thing. 13:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have seen Macklemore contend many times that they are a duo, and that all his work, performances and otherwise will include Ryan Lewis. However, since we have articles for both members, is it necessary to have this stub? Who knows how long this duo will last, MC/producer combinations never last forever and you cannot really compare their significance to Gang Starr or Eric B & Rakim. I just restored the content on his discography, there is no doubt in my mind that it should remain there. However, this is very very different from a will.i.am and Britney Spears article or a Jay-Z & Kanye West article, those were two solo artists collaborating, these two actually function as a group, their next album will also be a Macklemore & Ryan Lewis project. However, I am pretty sure if someone is looking for information, the previous dab page was much more helpful then this stub. STATic message me! 15:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
See above decision to keep article after long discussion werldwayd (talk) 02:22, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Macklemore & Ryan Lewis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Verb Tense

edit

The lead of the article is in past tense as if the duo has disbanded, but the official status of the duo is they are on hiatus therefore the duo still technically exists. The article for One Direction, another group that has not disbanded but is still technically in hiatus, is in present tense. What would be the correct way to talk about groups on hiatus considering that One Direction has a lead in present tense but this article on Macklemore & Ryan Lewis have a lead in past tense? You can't have two separate standards because both groups have the same official status. 24.180.22.224 (talk) 18:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply