Talk:Macropomoides
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Macropomoides article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
May i use these sources instead?
edithttps://www.academia.edu/7697668/The_Prehistoric_Survivor_Paradigm_And_More_On_Possible_Post-Cretaceous_Plesiosaurs? https://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id1075889/? https://fauna-palaestina-part-1.webs.com/faunapalaestina4.htm--Bubblesorg (talk) 21:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Absolutely not because the first is a cryptozoologist's rant against his critics, and the second two URLs lead to material written by the exact same crackpot devotee of Creationist crank Harun Yahya whose nonsense I've deleted from this article. I mean, are you aware that Khalaf never actually has ever ever bothered to ever provide even a drawing of either Macropomoides miocaenius or M. palestina? I mean, it doesn't strike you as odd?--Mr Fink (talk) 00:40, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah--Bubblesorg (talk) 15:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Then please stop suggesting we use these garbage sources, please!--Mr Fink (talk) 16:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, i might have been fooled by "BioLib is an international encyclopedia of plants, fungi and animals.
Apart from taxonomic system you can visit our gallery, glossary, vernacular names dictionary, database of links and literature, systems of biotopes, discussion forum and several other functions related to biology.
It is a non-commercial educational project intended to be used both by experts and general public. Its content can be expanded by user contributions." on the biolib source--Bubblesorg (talk) 18:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Their credibility has been severely damaged, if not shot to Hell entirely if they will blindly accept the bilge of a crackpot like Khalaf's.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
So that means the only credible Cenozoic celocanth the one from Sweden not this isreli one, plus he mentions palastine, not even a country recognized by most of the world (such things can get foreign scientist confused) . So why even mention it unless he is a bias person, although where does it say he supports Harun Yahya? i have heard about Harun Yahya but still. --Bubblesorg (talk) 03:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)