Talk:Madelung equations

Unsourced assertions

I wish this article had better references.

• As far as I can tell Madelung does not mention quantum Euclid equations in his paper. I removed the connection in the ref.

The following unsourced phrase makes no sense to me:

• "...even though, unlike in classical fluid dynamics, there are no underlying particles carrying microscopic parcels of probabilities around."

I don't believe classical fluids have underlying particles. What is a parcel of probability? Oh, it does not matter because the subject is "unlike" a fluid dynamics of such particles. I deleted this bit.

• The section called "Consequences" just seems like equations and jargon with no reader value. I would expand it if it had references to read.

A paragraph that ends:

• "...shows again that the vacuum fluctuations are the reason for quantum mechanics."

has no sources. I deleted it even though it was the only one that promised more than math. Johnjbarton (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)