Talk:Madelung equations
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Johnjbarton in topic Unsourced assertions
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
‹See TfM›
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Unsourced assertions
editI wish this article had better references.
- As far as I can tell Madelung does not mention quantum Euclid equations in his paper. I removed the connection in the ref.
The following unsourced phrase makes no sense to me:
- "...even though, unlike in classical fluid dynamics, there are no underlying particles carrying microscopic parcels of probabilities around."
I don't believe classical fluids have underlying particles. What is a parcel of probability? Oh, it does not matter because the subject is "unlike" a fluid dynamics of such particles. I deleted this bit.
- The section called "Consequences" just seems like equations and jargon with no reader value. I would expand it if it had references to read.
A paragraph that ends:
- "...shows again that the vacuum fluctuations are the reason for quantum mechanics."
has no sources. I deleted it even though it was the only one that promised more than math. Johnjbarton (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)