Talk:Madhabi

Madhabi was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 23, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Nepal Mid‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

GA Review

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Madhabi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 04:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Serious issues with this article, the main one being sourcing, with the entire Theme section and isolated sentences elsewhere being uncited. I'll get on to the rest of the review once this is addressed. AryKun (talk) 04:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Courtesy ping Wallflowernepal
Nearly a week since the start of the review and issues have still not been addressed, so I will fail this. AryKun (talk) 12:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic