This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
This article is not written within the scope of any wikiproject. Importance of any archaeological site is determined by localities as contributing to the sustainable future of archaeological sites --Kalogeropoulos (talk) 21:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Please have a look around Wikipedia and see how the WikiProject thing works in practice. Yes it is not mandatory, but by its content alone, an article automatically belongs to one or more projects and can be tagged so by any user. The author of an article does not own it nor the talk page. If you disagree with an assessment, just like with any edit, you are free to dispute it. Of course there is a subjective element to it, but there is also a guideline to get a rough idea. So while e.g. one might argue if something is "Low" or "Mid" important, or "Start" and "Stub", there is certainly a clear difference between "High" and "Low" importance, or a "start" article and a "GA" article. Blanket reverting the tags because you disagree with them and calling others names is definitely not the way to go around voicing your disagreement, however. Constantine ✍ 21:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
The author of an article does not own it nor the talk page. It seems to me that you don't understand that any article is not property of any editor either. So pls dont patronize me with declarations of this kind and don't let wikipedia look like a template's and wikiproject's dictatorship. I think you're clever enough to undestand it--Kalogeropoulos (talk) 22:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
