Talk:MageSlayer

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (3 participants)
Delibird (10 participants)
Melee weapon (3 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants)
Julia Chang (7 participants)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (7 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (10 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Vampire vs Quake engine

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There has been numerous speculations as to whether the Vampire engine was a fork of the Quake engine. Many people assumed Take No Prisoners & MageSlayer used the Quake engine to run their games. However Raven Software, creators of the 2 games, state they used their own 3D engine called Vampire. This report is a visual & feel comparison between Quake & Vampire engine to show how similar they really are.

MageSlayer & TNP game menus are a lot like Quake menu
MageSlayer & TNP both have in-game console screen with about 90% console commands like Quake's
MageSlayer & TNP have command-line executable parameters which is 90% like Quake's
MageSlayer & TNP water textures swirl like Quake water textures
MageSlayer & TNP coloured lighting effects are just like Quake coloured lignting effects
MageSlayer & TNP physics engine is more of less exactly like Quake's physics engine (play with gravity settings and it feels like Quake's)
In TNP you can do Quake's bunny-hopping exploit by repeatedly jumping and strafing and turning with the mouse

If you are an experienced Quake player (who knows how to tweak Quake with console commands & executable parameters) you will see that 90% of your knowledge also works/applies to MageSlayer & TNP and you get same results/feel/experience. The physics engine in all 3 games is just too similar.

Back in the mid 1990s Raven Software has always worked closely with ID Software and enhanced the Doom engine. They made Heretic & Hexen. Hexen was a better enhanced version of the Doom engine, but it was still the Doom engine and not written from scratch.

Back in 1997 the only other well developed 3D engine was Unreal. Back then it would take years to develop a good 3D engine like Unreal or Quake... so it's unrealistic to think Raven would create their own 3D engine from scratch. Most of games stated they were using either the Quake or Unreal engine (ie. Sin, Kingpin, Half-Life, Jedi Knight, Max Payne, Deus Ex, etc).

"Raven was working on the creation of its own game engine called Vampire." states from http://www.raven-games.com/games.php?i=tnp However they haven't mention whether Vampire was based off Quake engine.

Andwan0 (talk) 11:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

It sounds interesteing, but it is original research. Maybe this would be better for a discussion forum? Eik Corell (talk) 12:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

'Lord' Thane

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm looking at the manual right now, and he is the Lore Thane, not the Lord Thane (Clan of Knowledge, LORE Thane, you know?). Gonna change that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.14.32.110 (talk) 01:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on MageSlayer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic