Talk:Maghrebis

Image copyright problem with File:Édith Piaf.jpg

The image File:Édith Piaf.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

The article's name should be Maghreb peopleS

File:Maghreb people collage.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Maghreb people collage.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Population

Editor Pratyoybiswas recently changed the general population figure in the infobox from about 98 to about 88 million without specifying a source. The Infobox section "Regions with significant populations" lists various states and their Maghrebi populations with some sources; however, those numbers total to about 103 million rather than the overly precise 87,979,238 stated in the infobox without citation. Could someone help clarify these population numbers? --Bejnar (talk) 03:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Genetics for ethnic groups RfC

For editors interested, there's an RfC currently being held: Should sections on genetics be removed from pages on ethnic groups?. This has been set up to determine the appropriateness of sections such as the "Genetic evidence" section in this article. I'd encourage any contributors to voice their opinions there. --Katangais (talk) 20:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Maghrebis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150904023615/http://www.ins.nat.tn/indexen.php to http://www.ins.nat.tn/indexen.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521105207/http://www.upf.edu/enoticies/home_upf_en/1206.html to http://www.upf.edu/enoticies/home_upf_en/1206.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402102624/http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0096074%2F to http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0096074%2F
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6BNNjndve?url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ag.html to https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ag.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Lazaridis et al study

I've restored the sourced material removed by Blade and the rest in this edit: [1]. The edit summary doesn't give a clear explanation for its removal. The study uses samples from Corielle's "Iberian Populations in Spain" [2] and appears to support the statements in the article. I've also updated the citation, as it has subsequently been published in the journal Nature. --IamNotU (talk) 15:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)