Talk:Magna Moralia

Philosophy: Literature / Ethics / Ancient Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Ethics
	Ancient philosophy

More like Nicomachean or Eudemian Ethics?

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The introduction to the Magna Moralia in the Loeb edition notes Susemihl's opinion that it was extracted from the Eudemian Ethics and Brink's contention that they follow the general structure of the Nicomachean Ethics. Including all this information in the article would probably be too clumbsy, though. RJC ^Talk 23:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Virtues and Vices is spurious

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

According to Wikipedia article, it is NOT by Aristotle : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Virtues_and_Vices Mwidunn (talk) 00:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic