Talk:Magnolia sieboldii

Metric System

5-10 meters? What the hell is that?--24.177.6.38 (talk) 17:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

I agree. We Americans don't use the metric system and never will. Americans are also the primary users of Wikipedia so how about considering the customer? Someone put in the over all feet of the tree in good old fashioned feet. 33 feet is pretty darn tall for a "small" tree! Thank you very much but a lot of the rest of the article is still in the incomprehensible metric system.  Please fix. Thanks from Connecticut! --Mccommas (talk) 11:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

To say that Americans don't use the metric system is rather simplistic. Have a look at the entries in the Flora of North America, e.g. for the impeccably American Magnolia sieboldii. Scientists everywhere use the metric system. However, units should be converted, e.g. using {{cvt}}, not just for Americans, but for elderly Britons, like me, who grew up with yards, feet and inches. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Magnolia sieboldii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070505104021/http://www.fna.org/china/mss/volume07/Magnoliaceae-CAS_coauthoring.htm to http://www.fna.org/china/mss/volume07/Magnoliaceae-CAS_coauthoring.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Magnolia sieboldii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170525105020/http://www.forest.go.kr/kna/special/download/English_Names_for_Korean_Native_Plants.pdf to http://www.forest.go.kr/kna/special/download/English_Names_for_Korean_Native_Plants.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 26 December 2017 (UTC)