Talk:Mahmoud Ahmed Sherifo
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Indexing
editHi, I am of course open to the fact that something about my edit could have been wrong, but what exactly was it that you objected to? It was a simple indexing edit, whats the problem?? Jdcooper 15:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, first of all I thought I would change the name of the section as it is a bit more clear this way. I know that the edit you made did a sorting for the names. However, this is actually an ongoing discussion in the Eritrean and Ethiopian biography pages. People from these countries do not have last names. Typically people are indexed by their family name first and given name second. The convention in these countries however is quite the opposite. First you are indexed by your first name, then by your second and third...and so on and so forth. As you would understand, someone looking up Mahmoud would not look up Sherifo, but rather Mahmoud, then Ahmed then Sherifo... --Merhawie 17:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for the clarification, I have come across those debates for other cultures, I wasn't aware the same debate was relevant in this case. Hope its ok if I put back the other changes that were part of the same edit. Jdcooper 18:08, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- That's plenty fine. No worries! Thanks! Merhawie 20:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for the clarification, I have come across those debates for other cultures, I wasn't aware the same debate was relevant in this case. Hope its ok if I put back the other changes that were part of the same edit. Jdcooper 18:08, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:53, 15 December 2022 (UTC)