Had problems

edit

Thanks for your comments - my apologies; I was basically trying to copy edit for basic sense, chronology, bio standard headers, and similar elements, coming to it from outside to work on readability for a general reader. Forgot to save frequently and ran into edit conflicts, which turned into a very long effort (and probably where some of the dropped links happened.) As a comment, sometimes it seems too many cites are given for some of the non-controversial facts. Just because five sources affirm something, even a quote from the bio subject, they do not need to be included. Will try to track down your corrections. Have already reduced the lead; I think discussing every charge he's made against someone else is not necessary in the Lead.

What happened?

edit

Parkwells, This is not what we agreed to. You were supposed to do a rewrite of the lead ONLY, and then allow Khazar2 to do another take on the lead. Why didn't you follow the agreed upon process, unorthodox as it was? My concern is that you're also introducing errors or removing information that is not tracked. Crtew (talk) 07:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Clearly, I misunderstood. How many times do you want me to apologize? I corrected the error on sedition (which others could have done when they saw it), and will leave the article to all of you to do with as you will. Maybe you might give me credit for also introducing some factual, cited content that adds to understanding what was going on.Parkwells (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Crtew, who agreed with you to re-write only the lead?--FreemesM (talk) 13:37, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mahmudur Rahman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply