Talk:Main Road, Hobart
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Evad37 in topic Disambiguation style
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Main Road, Hobart article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
.svg){kind=small} | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
"Main Road"
editI must say I'm extremely surprised that there isn't a "Main Road" anywhere else in the world with an article! -- Chuq 14:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am indeed mystified by this as well - maybe all the other have qualifying locations in their article titles or something like that SatuSuro 04:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- How about the American main road? That's clearly very notable. TheBlazikenMaster 13:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Disambiguation style
editNote: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)