Talk:Make Room for Lisa

Fair use rationale for Image:Aabf12.jpg

Image:Aabf12.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Make Room for Lisa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 15:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

No images anyway, so we're golden

2. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• Wikilink the characters in the plot section (Marge, Homer etc)
• Remember to have sentences with quotes end with citations

That's really it. Nice work! As always, I'll place the review on hold for seven days, though I know you'll get to it before then :) Ruby2010 comment! 15:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

I think I've fixed all the problems now. As always, thanks for the review! :D Queenieacoustic (talk) 16:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Looks good. Pass for GA. Ruby2010 comment! 16:15, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Why does this article take up so much space

It's articles such as these which preclude me from ever even considering contributing financially to Wiki. Why on Earth does this article exist, and why is it 13 paragraphs long? This is completely unworthy of a general encyclopedia, it is laughable. IF it must take up space in the wiki sphere, I would suggest it be paired down to at most 2 paragraphs, and it should be made apparent what it's notability is.--Tallard (talk) 17:50, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Make Room for Lisa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dvdtown.com/review/simpsons-the-the-complete-10th-season/dvd/5056
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928144150/http://www.dignews.com/reviews/the-simpsons-season-10-review/ to http://www.dignews.com/reviews/the-simpsons-season-10-review/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC)