Talk:Making Social Science Matter
Latest comment: 11 years ago by MartinPoulter in topic Merge in Flyvbjerg Debate
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge in Flyvbjerg Debate
editThe creation of Flyvbjerg Debate seems to be one of a huge number of vanity edits made by a devoted fan of Bent Flyvberg. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sonderbro/Archive and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#WP:CITESPAM_by_Bent_Flyvbjerg Its content seems just a duplicate of the content of this article. What the "debate" article seems to be about is so nebulous that it can safely be lost, and anything about reactions to the book Making Social Science Matter belongs in this article. MartinPoulter (talk) 12:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Agree. It's really a non controversial merge. Go for it.--Hu12 (talk) 22:58, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Having compared the articles more closely, there wasn't anything at all to copy over, so it's replaced with a redirect. MartinPoulter (talk) 19:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)