Talk:Making the Bed/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 11:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: FishLoveHam (talk · contribs) 19:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this soon! FishLoveHam (talk) 19:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Prose

Incredibly strong prose, I only have a few comments.

Lead

• "personal flaws" → "flaws".

Background and release

• "&" → "and" (WP:&)
• "over a period of" → "over".
• Remove the comma after "album" (para 3).

Critical reception

• "about it" feels a little clunky, try rewording or remove.

References

• Why are some sources archived, yet others aren't?

• The use of singlechart templates is usually encouraged, and I haven't seen anybody adding archives to those. The others are all archived.--NØ 12:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Personally I would, but it isn't a requirement, so I'll leave it up to you. FishLoveHam (talk) 14:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Spot check

• [1] Y
• [6] Y
• [10] Y
• [15] a. Y b. Y
• [19] Y
• [24] Y
• [28] Y
• [33] a. Y b. Y
• [37] a. Y b. Y
• [42] Y
• [46] Y
• [51] Y
• [55] Y
• [60] Y
• [64] Y

Earwig's copyvio reported 32.4% in similarity

Seems like a fine score since it's not catching authored content but rather attributed song lyrics.--NØ 12:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Yeah it's a good score, just something I felt was necessary to point out. FishLoveHam (talk) 14:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Overall, this should be a quick, easy pass, ping when you've addressed my comments! FishLoveHam (talk) 18:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, FishLoveHam. All should be addressed now. I am glad you found the prose strong. I do love this song and worked quite hard on this!--NØ 12:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

You've done a great job. Passing :) FishLoveHam (talk) 14:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·