Talk:Makoto Tomioka

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Czar in topic Merger with Girochinsha
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Makoto Tomioka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merger with Girochinsha

edit

This article was recently redirected to the article Girochinsha without any attempt to discuss a merger of the content, to preserve it or deletion due to lack of notability. Please go through the proper process and propose the article for deletion or else merge it with Girochinsha, first. The options to preserve the content should be explored, rather than just being redirected, with no attempt to move the content into the target article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 12:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article has been unsourced and tagged for cleanup for seven years. Per my edit summary, this subject is only covered in relation to Girochinsha/the Guillotine Society. It would be out of order to send this to AfD, as bold redirection is the preferred alternative. It also does not warrant discussion when uncontroversial, e.g., when seven years unsourced. Wikipedia doesn't follow process for its own sake: If you don't have reliable sources either for the existing unsourced content or for expansion, you're welcome to share them and make your case, but you're mistaking who has the burden for preserving unsourced content. czar 14:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply