Talk:Malaysia Federal Route 1

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malaysia Federal Route 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160119122333/http://hids.arkib.gov.my/readarticle.php?article_id=8503 to http://hids.arkib.gov.my/readarticle.php?article_id=8503

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Butterworth–Juru Highway into Malaysia Federal Route 1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge, given no support and an objection with stale discussion; reference improvement is warranted. Klbrain (talk) 10:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

---

Butterworth–Juru Highway is an article that remained unreferenced since 2007. In a previous AfD, the consensus was to keep but no objection to redirect. The redirect was challenged by Rschen7754, and since no sources have been provided so far, I guess a merger discussion with input from the community is what it will take to set this in stone. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 16:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

• As said previously, this is part of the most important highway in Malaysia, and Malaysia is not a small country by any means. Oppose. --Rschen7754 00:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

  You do realize that "Unsourced material may be challenged and removed" actually means something, right? If it is an important highway, there's no way no suitable coverage about it can be found. and from the previous AfD, it doesn't seem to be lack of effort in finding the sources. We can't exactly let a unreferenced article stay indefinitely, so it's either delete or redirect. I don't really see why it has to be kept in its current form. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 00:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

  WP:NODEADLINE. Also see [1], where it is highly frowned upon to remove unsourced material for the sake of removing unsourced material. --Rschen7754 00:43, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

  WP:NODEADLINE is not a policy.

  As for the discussion you cited, I don't think we are on the same page here. It's not like I just want to remove all unsourced claims that I came across, nor am I just nominating random articles with unreferenced tags. There is a huge difference between "unsourced claims in an article with sources" and "8 whole pages of unsourced articles about roads in Malaysia". I've conducted searches for sources and found nothing suitable, and I believed many of the editors on the previous AfD did too, which is why many of the did not object to a redirect. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 03:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)