Talk:Malcolm Goldstein
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jewish?
editWas Goldstein a Jew? --84.228.160.209 23:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- Why not ask him? He's still living. Goldstein is usually a Jewish name, but it's hard to say if he is religious or not. Badagnani 23:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- yes, of sorts --Diablorex 06:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Please restore CD cover image
editPlease restore the CD cover image; it was improper to delete summarily. Thanks. Badagnani 04:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- No, it cannot be used this way per WP:FU, and you cannot just remove the disputed fair use tag, as I have advised you on your talk page. -- But|seriously|folks 04:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- On second thought, I have restored the image. But please do not add it to this article as it is currently written, because that would violate WP:FU. Thanks. -- But|seriously|folks 04:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
It was extremely hasty at best, and immature and rude at worst, to delete the image summarily as you did (then to threaten me on my "Talk" page, after having targeted numerous images of mine in one go, showing that you'd been digging through my contributions in the "wikistalking" manner with which we've become all too familiar over the past year). That was very, very bad and wrong of you. It would be very kind of you to exercise a bit more deliberation and consideration for other editors in future, thanks. I'm afraid I don't agree with you that the cover photo was used improperly. Badagnani 21:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- You are misusing the term Wikistalking in an effort to cover up your own transgressions of Wikipedia's image policies. Also, I did what you asked and restored the image. I'm not asking you to thank me, but your continuing criticism is neither appropriate nor appreciated. If you want to get a third opinion, feel free to take any of my tags to Wikipedia:Fair use review. -- But|seriously|folks 22:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- This image use does clearly violate WP:FU. It should be removed or put in a context that follows the guidelines.Ribbonabaca (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
note on source addition
editAdded external link to liner notes, and for full disclosure I work for the non-profit educational resource linked to. The notes provide reference for several facts in this article. Ribbonabaca (talk) 18:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)