Talk:Male warrior hypothesis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Male warrior hypothesis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Title capitalization

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

As far as I know, "male warrior hypothesis" (no caps) is correct. However, that currently exists as a redirect to Mark van Vugt. Any thoughts on how to fix that? Me, Myself & I (talk) 06:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I'm putting in a request for a move, as I suspect the only reason this page uses this capitalization is because there was a redirect in the way. Me, Myself & I (☮) (talk) 18:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC)Reply