This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Yes, it is clear that they should be merged -- but under which name? Looking at the archive.org copy of the Encyclopedia Britannica for volume 25 pg. 769, that source calls the consul of 399 Mallius Theodorus. However, John Matthews, Western Aristocracies and Imperial Court AD 364-425 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1975) pp. 216-219 calls him Manlius Theodorus. (It's clear that both refer to the same man -- writer, consul, associate of Claudian & Augustine.) Although Manlius is the more familiar & expected name (IIRC, Mallius is Latin for "apple" & who would use "apple" for a masculine name?), the inscription mentioned in the article reads Mallio Theodoro; there is a principle in textual studies of the less familiar form should always be preferred, although stonecutters are known to make mistakes in their inscriptions. Anyone have access to any other authoritative sources that can break this impasse, like the PLRE? (The first chance I get to consult a copy, I'll see if I can answer my own question.) -- llywrch (talk) 06:23, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
